Jack Yesner Week 12- Amending the Jeopardy Rules
The popular trivia competition series Jeopardy! has undergone many changes since its syndication in 1984, including doubling money values, removing a buzzer sound, and implementing the rule that contestants can only buzz in after the entire clue is read. However, no rule change has been as significant as the one made at the start of the twentieth season in 2003. Previously, contestants could only win a maximum of five games and 75,000 cumulative dollars, however, both caps were since removed. After the rule change, contestants could now win as many times until they lost, which was seen almost immediately with Ken Jennings, who won over 2.5 million dollars over a span of 75 games between 2003 and 2004. Since Jennings’ historic run, multiple other contestants have taken advantage of this rule change to win many games and amass large sums of money. The most recent of these contestants is current contestant Amy Schneider, who has accumulated 1,382,800 dollars in 40 games (as of January 25, 2022), the second longest streak only shorter than Jennings’. Additionally, long game streaks have been occurring more frequently statistically, and in the current season of Jeopardy, season 38, only 4 episodes have not featured a returning champion that has won at least five games.
The frequency and longevity of current Jeopardy champions has led old champions who were capped at five wins to detest the rule change and call for its removal. One such champion, Tom Nichols, a five-day champion who won his games in 1994, has been vocal about his contempt for the removal of the win cap. Nichols argues that after a returning champion has won a couple of games, they become well acquainted with the buzzer system and gain an unfair advantage over new contestants. He additionally states that by encouraging long-term, notable winners, Jeopardy loses its credibility as a show designed to quiz knowledge.
While Nichols’ complaints may certainly be valid, it is unlikely that the rule change will ever be revoked. Typically, ratings have dramatically increased when the returning champion has won for a significant amount of days. Currently, Jeopardy ratings are at a season high due to Schneider’s run. Since producers of the show would not want ratings to decrease, it would not be in their best interests to rescind the rule. What do you think? Should Jeopardy stay as it is today or reinstate the winnings cap? Should previous winners that were capped at five wins be compensated in some way, such as being given a second shot in a new episode or being invited to attend a new tournament featuring past winners?
I think Jeopardy! should remain without the win cap because I think it is fun to watch your favorite contestants and cheer for them. If you have contestants switching out too frequently, you don't get to cheer for just one person because they end up getting switched out by the end of the week. However, with longer streaks like Amy Schneider, James Holzhauer, and Matt Amodio have gotten, people become more passionate about watching and tend to enjoy it more because they have someone to go back to each weekday to watch and cheer for.
ReplyDelete